Legal Opinion

McIntire v. Woodall

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided September 22, 1995No. 94-092PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThayer, J.

The plaintiff, Robert McIntire d/b/a Hillside Machine, appeals the decision of the Superior Court (Fitzgerald, J.) granting the defendant, Catherine Woodall, a continued sales commission. We affirm.

In May 1987, the defendant approached the plaintiff offering to bring him business. The plaintiff agreed to pay the defendant a ten percent commission on sales resulting from her efforts. In July 1987, the defendant provided the plaintiff with plans from Varían Extrion (Varían), a Massachusetts company. The plaintiff bid on the plans and was awarded a contract with Varían to manufacture machined…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Tsiatsios v. TsiatsiosSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1995
  2. Weale v. Massachusetts General Housing Corp.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1977
  3. State v. WeeksSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1993
  4. In re BlakeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1993
  5. McCrillis v. American Heel Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1931

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. McIntire v. LeeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2003
  2. State v. GoodaleSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1999
  3. Appeal of BrownSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1998
  4. Appeal of Omega Entertainment, LLCSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2007
  5. In Re SawyerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2010

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API