Legal Opinion
Johnson v. Glickman
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided February 9, 2001No. 99-2180-KHVPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
VRATIL, District Judge.
Anna R. Johnson alleges that on account of her race and in retaliation for prior complaints of discrimination, defendant reassigned her and thereby restricted her ability to train in the finance division of the Kansas City office of the United Stated Department of Agriculture (“USDA”). 1 Defendant maintains that plaintiffs claims are barred because she did not contact an Equal Employment Opportunity counselor (“EEO counselor”) within 45 days of the reassignment pursuant to 29 C.F.R. § 1614.105(a)(1). Plaintiff agrees that she did not contact an EEO…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Zipes v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Belinda MARTIN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NANNIE AND THE NEWBORNS, INC.; Business Solutions, Inc.; Larry D. Gudgel, Defendants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
- Smith v. Midland Brake, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
- Bullington v. United Air Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
- Jeffries v. State of KansasCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Klugel v. SmallDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
- Welsh v. HaglerDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Graves v. Bank of America, N.A.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2014
- Lloyd v. ChaoDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2002
- Brucks v. O'NEILLDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2001
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.