Richardson v. Emerson
Wisconsin Supreme Court
The facts in this case, so far as they are necessary for the appreciation of the opinion of the court, are contained therein.
1Opinion of the Court
By the Gmiri,
Smith, J.
This was an action of trespass, guare ólausum fregit, "brought in the court below, by the defendant in error, and others, against the plaintiff in error and others, where a verdict and judgment were rendered against the defendant, James Richardson, for $359 and costs.
The record shows that the alleged trespass consisted *320in the removing of a portion of a dam, built across the stream of water in said county, called the Catfish.
jrrom the bill of exceptions, it appears that the q¡uestiorL js quilt in part on the land of the defendant Richardson; that the western boundary line…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Griffin v. ClarkIdaho Supreme Court · 1935
- Day v. WaltonTennessee Supreme Court · 1955
- Askay v. MaloneyOregon Supreme Court · 1917
- Gerbig v. BellWisconsin Supreme Court · 1910
- Garnett v. Atoka State BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.