Legal Opinion
Garnett v. Atoka State Bank
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided March 4, 1924No. 14242PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
POSTER, C.
Charles H. Gar-nett, plaintiff in error, plaintiff below, sued C. K. Boardman and about 400 state banks in the state of Oklahoma in the district court of Oklahoma county to recover damages for the alleged wrongful publication of a libel.
Service of summons was never obtained upon C. K. Boardman, and only about 87 of the defendant banks were finally served with summons, and the cause proceeded against the various individual state banks which had beefl served with summons, the defendants in error here.
The parties will be referred to as they appeared in the court below.
Prom a…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- City of Valparaiso v. MoffittIndiana Court of Appeals · 1895
- Strauhal v. Asiatic Steamship Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1906
- Powell v. Aiken & GwinnSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1841
- Richardson v. EmersonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1854
- Wert v. PottsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1889
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Hammond v. Kansas, O. & G. R. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925