Legal Opinion

State v. Stuart

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided March 12, 1970No. 4798Published

1Opinion of the Court

466 P.2d 444 (1970)

STATE of Hawaii

v.

J.D. STUART, also known as J.D. James.

No. 4798.

Supreme Court of Hawaii.

March 12, 1970.

James M. Morita and Robert S. Toyofuku, Honolulu, for defendant-appellant.

William J. Eggers, III, Deputy Pros. Atty., Honolulu, Barry Chung, Pros. Atty., on the brief, for plaintiff-appellee.

Before RICHARDSON, C.J., MARUMOTO, ABE, and LEVINSON, JJ., and Circuit Judge OGATA for KOBAYASHI, J., disqualified.

RICHARDSON, Chief Justice.

Defendant was convicted in circuit court of embezzlement. This appeal challenges the sufficiency of the evidence on the question of intent and…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Duncan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Holland v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  3. Curley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1947
  4. United States v. Roy Arthur NelsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
  5. Earl R. Cephus v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1963

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API