Legal Opinion
Potts v. Hartford Life & Accident Insurance Co.
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided September 28, 2017No. CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:16-35PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
KIM R. GIBSON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
I. Introduction
Before the Court are motions for summary judgment by Jennifer Potts, Plaintiff (ECF No. 56) and Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company (“HLAIC” or “Hartford. Life”), Defendant. (ECF No. 59.) The issues have been fully briefed (see ECF Nos. 57, 58, 60, 61, 62, 63,' 64, 65, 66, 67) and both motions are ripe for disposition. For the reasons that follow, Plaintiffs motion will be DENIED and Defendant’s motion will be GRANTED.
II. Jurisdiction
This Court has subject matter jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1331, as…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Black & Decker Disability Plan v. NordSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Richard Davis v. Hartford Life & Accident Ins.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020
- Scott Griffin v. Hartford Life & Accident Ins.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2018
- Davis v. Hartford Life & Accident Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2019
- Hitchens v. Plumbers and Pipefitters Local Union No. 74 Pension FundDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2022
- MULLINS v. THE CONSOL ENERGY, INC. LONG TERM DISABILITY PLANDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2022
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.