ADC Telecommunications, Inc. v. Panduit Corp.
District Court, D. Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
MONTGOMERY, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff ADC Telecommunications, Inc. (“ADC”), filed a complaint against Defendant Panduit Corporation (“Panduit”), alleging that Panduit’s products infringe four of ADC’s design patents and three of ADC’s utility patents. On January 11, 2002, the undersigned United States District Judge heard the parties’ claim construction arguments and Panduit’s Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. No. 39]. For the reasons set forth below, the claims are construed as stated and the Motion for Summary Judgment is denied.
II. BACKGROUND
ADC…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Torspo Hockey International, Inc. v. Kor Hockey Ltd.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2007
- Luv n' Care, Ltd. v. Regent Baby Products Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2012
- Delta T, LLC v. Dan's Fan City, Inc.District Court, M.D. Florida · 2021
- Tecumseh Products Co. v. Briggs & Stratton Corp.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2003