Legal Opinion
Luv n' Care, Ltd. v. Regent Baby Products Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided July 31, 2012No. 10 Civ. 9492PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
SHIRA A. SCHEINDLIN, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Luv n’ Care, Ltd. and Admar International, Inc. (collectively, “LNC”) bring this infringement action against Regent Baby Products Corp. d/b/a Baby King (“Regent”). In April, a jury trial was held before Judge Louis Stanton. The jury determined that two of LNC’s design patents, D617,465 (“the '465 patent”) and D634,439 (“the '439 patent”), were not primarily dictated by function.1 Regent now moves this Court for judgment as a matter of law on the patents’ functionality, or in the alternative, a new trial. For the reasons set…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Inwood Laboratories, Inc. v. Ives Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Zellner v. SummerlinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
- Henry v. Wyeth Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
- Egyptian Goddess, Inc. v. Swisa, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Toliver v. New York City Department of CorrectionsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2016
- Carlton v. C.O. PearsonDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2019