Legal Opinion
Harold Friedman, Inc. v. Kroger Company
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided June 26, 1978No. 77-2223PublishedCited by 60 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
VAN DUSEN, Circuit Judge.
This is an appeal from an order granting defendant’s motion for summary judgment in a case brought under §§ 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act. We affirm.
I
The record establishes the following facts. The plaintiff, Harold Friedman, Inc. (hereinafter Friedman), is a franchisee of Foodland, Inc., a national grocery store chain. Prior to the actions complained of, Friedman operated four Foodland grocery stores in the Butler, Pa., area. At the time the complaint was filed and at the time the motion for summary judgment was granted, Friedman operated five such…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Poller v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- American Tobacco Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Swift & Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by60 opinions
- Spectrum Sports, Inc. v. McQuillanSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- In re Japanese Electronic Products Antitrust LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
- Elliot Fineman the Industry Network System, Inc. v. Armstrong World Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
- Edward J. Sweeney & Sons, Inc., and Mission Gas Oil Company, Inc. And Petroleum Products Co. v. Texaco, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
- Pastore v. Bell Telephone Co. of PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.