Legal Opinion

Smith v. Wright

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided August 9, 2013No. 2012-431PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDooley, J.

¶ 1. Defendant appeals from a final relief-from-abuse order in which the family division of the superior court concluded that plaintiff was a vulnerable adult and that defendant abused and exploited her. We affirm.

¶ 2. Plaintiff was born in November 1992. She was deaf for the first several years of her life, resulting in developmental delays that caused her to be held back in school. She met defendant, who was born in March 1972, while he was doing some carpentry work for her stepfather sometime between 2007 and 2009. Beginning in the summer of 2009, plaintiff accepted defendant’s invitation…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bull v. Pinkham Engineering Assocs., Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2000
  2. Raynes v. RogersSupreme Court of Vermont · 2008
  3. Lay v. Pettengill, NovotnySupreme Court of Vermont · 2011
  4. Omega Optical, Inc. v. Chroma Technology Corp.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2002
  5. Siegel v. MischSupreme Court of Vermont · 2007

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. C. Paige Hinkson v. Stuart StevensSupreme Court of Vermont · 2020
  2. City of Newport v. Village of Derby CenterSupreme Court of Vermont · 2014
  3. Barrup v. BarrupSupreme Court of Vermont · 2014
  4. Carissa Poss v. Seth AlarieSupreme Court of Vermont · 2023
  5. Barrup v. BarrupSupreme Court of Vermont · 2014

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API