Legal Opinion
United States v. Mark Young
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided September 14, 1995No. 95-1097PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RIPPLE, Circuit Judge.
This case is before us for the third time. Mark Young’s principal contention is that our remand order following the second appeal was limited in scope. He submits that our order permitted the district court to revisit only its calculation of the quantity of marijuana attributable to him. Therefore, he contends, the district court exceeded its authority when it ordered an upward departure on resentencing. For the reasons that follow, we affirm in part and dismiss in part for lack of jurisdiction.
I
BACKGROUND
The facts and procedural background of this case are set forth in…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- United States v. Michael MustreadCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Candelario Gutierrez, Jose Medina, and Jose SotoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
- United States v. Pedro Gomez, Fernando Magana, and Rigoberto VelaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Bernard J. Morgano, Dominick Palermo, Nicholas Guzzino, Peter Petros, Sam Nuzzo, Jr. And Samuel GloriosoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Marc L. PollandCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- United States v. Clinton S. Parker, Also Known as SpankyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
- Jeffrey Kemezy v. James PetersCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
- United States v. Mark A. WhiteCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Tommy AdamsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014
- United States v. Kenneth R. MooreCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.