Legal Opinion
United States v. Bernard J. Morgano, Dominick Palermo, Nicholas Guzzino, Peter Petros, Sam Nuzzo, Jr. And Samuel Glorioso
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided December 20, 1994No. 92-1828, 92-1829, 92-2069, 92-2144 and 92-2224PublishedCited by 83 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TINDER, District Judge.
Six defendants were convicted by a jury of operating a racketeering enterprise, 18 U.S.C. § 1962(c) (RICO), conspiring to operate a racketeering enterprise, 18 U.S.C. § 1962(d), interstate travel in aid of racketeering, 18 U.S.C. § 1952, illegal gambling, 18 U.S.C. § 1955, and extortion, 18 U.S.C. § 1951, in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Indiana. Each was subsequently sentenced to a lengthy prison term. All Defendants appeal their convictions and several challenge their sentences. Because their appeals were consolidated, numerous issues…
2Cases cited105 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Pate v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
100 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by83 opinions
- United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee/ (99-1003) v. Jack William Tocco, (98-2312/2426)/ Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
- United States v. Edward WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
- United States v. Michael K. LeggettCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
- United States v. Thomas J. MaloneyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
- United States v. Frank J. Bonanno and Lawrence J. GoldsteinCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
78 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.