Neuhoff v. State
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RUCKER, Judge
Appellant-Defendant David A. Neuhoff was charged with dealing in marijuana as a Class C felony. A jury found him guilty of the included offense of attempted dealing in marijuana, also a Class C felony. Neuhoff now appeals raising three issues for our review which we rephrase as: (1) did the trial court err in denying Neuhoffs motion to suppress the evidence, (2) was the trial court’s instruction on attempted dealing in marijuana erroneous, and (3) was the evidence sufficient to sustain the conviction.
We affirm.
On June 10,1997, postal inspectors in Texas intercepted a…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Houser v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. Van CleaveIndiana Supreme Court · 1996
- Jaggers v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1997
- Pritchard v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1967
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- State v. HobbsIndiana Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. RabbDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
- Prewitt v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002
- Rios v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002
- Hoop v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2009
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.