Legal Opinion
Hoop v. State
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided July 14, 2009No. 49A02-0807-CR-666PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MAY, Judge.
Jonathon Hoop brings this interlocutory appeal from the denial of his motion to suppress. The challenged evidence was seized during the execution of a search warrant, which was issued after an officer had a drug-detecting dog sniff the front door of Hoop's residence. We conclude that under Article 1, Section 11 of the Indiana Constitution, an officer needs reasonable suspicion to conduct a dog sniff of a private residence. Even if that requirement was not met in this case, the officers relied on the warrant in good faith. Therefore, we affirm.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
On…
2Cases cited54 opinions
- United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Ornelas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- United States v. PlaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. JacobsenSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Illinois v. CaballesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- State v. GuillenArizona Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. KonoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2016
- Rice v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2009
- State v. CorreaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2021
- Johnson v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2011
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.