Legal Opinion

State v. Hobbs

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided September 30, 2010No. 19S01-1001-CR-10PublishedCited by 58 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOEHM, Justice.

The defendant was arrested at a public restaurant for an unrelated crime. A drug dog called to sniff the defendant's car in the restaurant's parking lot indicated narcotics in the car. We hold that the Fourth Amendment does not prohibit a warrantless search of an operational vehi-ele found in a public place if the police have probable cause to believe the vehicle contains evidence of a crime. We also hold that the search was reasonable and did not violate the Indiana Constitution because the defendant was already under arrest and the dog's alert gave the officers probable cause…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  4. Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by58 opinions

  1. Kevin M. Clark v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2013
  2. State v. WeaverCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2011
  3. State v. LloydNevada Supreme Court · 2013
  4. Will Thomas v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2017
  5. Commonwealth v. LoughnaneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2017

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API