Legal Opinion
In Re Xerox Corp. Securities Litigation
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided September 30, 2010No. Civil Action 3:99CV02374 (AWT)PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON MOTION TO EXCLUDE THE PROFFERED EXPERT TESTIMONY OF ANTHONY SAUNDERS, LEE BUCHWALD AND CHARLES DROTT
ALVIN W. THOMPSON, District Judge.
For the reasons set forth below, the Motion to Exclude the Proffered Expert Testimony of Anthony Saunders, Lee Buchwald and Charles Drott is being granted in part, and denied in part. The motion is being granted with respect to Lee Buchwald and any proffered testimony by Anthony Saunders or Charles Drott as to scienter.
I. BACKGROUND
The court assumes familiarity with the factual background of the case. See In re Xerox Corp. Sec. Litig., 165 F.Supp.2d…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Tellabs, Inc. v. Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Bourjaily v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- ECA, Local 134 IBEW Joint Pension Trust of Chicago v. JP Morgan Chase Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. RazmilovicCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013
- Bricklayers & Trowel Trades International Pension Fund v. Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLCCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2014
- Dalberth v. Xerox Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2014
- Reed Construction Data Inc. v. McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2014
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. RazmilovicDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2011
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.