Legal Opinion

In Re the Master Contract Between the Oahe Conservancy Subdistrict & United States

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided March 29, 1971No. File 10876Published

1Opinion of the Court

185 N.W.2d 682 (1971)

In the Matter of the Confirmation and Approval of the Master Contract between the OAHE CONSERVANCY SUBDISTRICT and the United States, the Validity of the Organization of the Oahe Conservancy Subdistrict, and the Validity of the Authority of the Oahe Conservancy Subdistrict to levy an assessment to satisfy the Subdistrict's Contract Obligations.

No. 10876.

Supreme Court of South Dakota.

March 29, 1971.

Gordon Mydland, Atty. Gen., R. James Zieser, William J. Srstka, Jr., Asst. Attys. Gen., Pierre, for Oahe Conservancy Subdistrict.

BIEGELMEIER, Judge.

The South Dakota Conservancy…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Wilson v. Board of TrusteesIllinois Supreme Court · 1890
  2. People Ex Rel. Rogers v. LetfordSupreme Court of Colorado · 1938
  3. Nebraska Mid-State Reclamation District v. Hall CountyNebraska Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Knight v. GrimesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1964
  5. La Mesa, Lemon Grove & Spring Valley Irrigation District v. HalleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API