Legal Opinion
Board of Governors of the University of North Carolina v. Helpingstine
District Court, M.D. North Carolina
Decided January 9, 1989No. Civ. C-87-447-DPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
BULLOCK, District Judge.
Plaintiffs instituted this action against Defendants under the Lanham Act, specifically 15 U.S.C. §§ 1114 and 1125, and N.C. Gen.Stat. § 75-1.1, alleging trademark infringement, false designation of source or origin, and unfair and deceptive trade practices. Defendants denied such practices and brought counterclaims under the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1, and N.C.Gen.Stat. §§ 66-58 and 75-1.1, asserting restraint of trade, unlawful competition with state citizens in the sale of goods, and unfair and deceptive trade practices. Defendants also claimed…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Edelman v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Parker v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Abercrombie & Fitch Company v. Hunting World, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
- San Francisco Arts & Athletics, Inc. v. United States Olympic CommitteeSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- University of Kansas v. SinksDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2008
- Paramount Pictures v. Video Broadcasting SystemsDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1989
- McAdoo v. University of North Carolina at Chapel HillDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2017
- Board of Trustees of University v. Professional Therapy Services, Inc.District Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1995
- City of Gastonia v. Balfour Beatty Construction Corp.District Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2002
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.