Legal Opinion · Dissent

Maloney v. State Ex Rel. Prosecuting Attorney

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided October 27, 1930Published

1Dissent

In the early case of Beene v. State, 22 Ark. 149, the court quoted with approval the language of Chief Justice MARSHALL in Ex parte Burr, 9 Wheat. 530, as follows: "On one hand, the profession of an attorney is of great importance to an individual, and the prosperity of his whole life may depend on its exercise. The right to exercise it ought not to be lightly or capriciously taken from him. On the other, it is extremely desirable that the respectability of the bar should be maintained, and that its harmony with the bench should be preserved. For these objects, some controlling power, some…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ex Parte BurrSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
  2. Wernimont v. State ex rel. Little Rock Bar Ass'nSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1911
  3. Beene v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1860
  4. Craig v. SimsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1923
  5. State Ex Rel. Greene County Bar v. HuddlestonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1927

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API