Legal Opinion
Martinez v. City of San Antonio
Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)
Decided January 31, 2001No. 04-99-00872-CVPublishedCited by 69 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PAUL W. GREEN, Justice.
Approximately six-hundred San Antonio residents claim to have been injured as a result of exposure to lead contaminated soils excavated from the site of a former iron foundry during construction of the Alamodome Sports Complex. In three separate lawsuits, which were later consolidated for discovery purposes, the residents named numerous defendants, including the City of San Antonio, VIA Metropolitan Transit (“VIA”)(developer of the Alamodome project), and Alamo Iron Works (prior owner of the iron foundry). The defendants filed traditional and “no evidence”…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. HavnerTexas Supreme Court · 1997
- EI Du Pont De Nemours & Co. v. RobinsonTexas Supreme Court · 1996
- Acuna v. Brown & Root Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
- State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. S.S.Texas Supreme Court · 1993
- Union Pump Co. v. AllbrittonTexas Supreme Court · 1995
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by69 opinions
- Restaurant Teams International, Inc. v. MG Securities Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2002
- Brewer & Pritchard, P.C. v. Johnson, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2005
- Blake v. Intco Investments of Texas, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2003
- Grinnell v. Munson, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2004
- Rayon v. Energy Specialties, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2002
64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.