Legal Opinion

Gulledge v. Seaboard Air Line Railway Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 28, 1908PublishedCited by 17 opinions

PbtitioN to rebear tbis -case reported in 147 N. C., p. 234. , . '

1Opinion of the CourtBuown, J.

Tbe petition of tbe learned counsel for tbe plaintiff, asking us to reconsider our decision in tbis case, seems to be based upon tbe idea that we have overruled a decision in wbicb by some means tbe plaintiff bad acquired a vested right. Williams v. B. and L. Association, 131 N. C., 267.

Eor tbe reasons so clearly stated by Mr. Justice Hoke in Mason v. Nelson, at tbis term, tbe plaintiff could acquire no vested right in such an adjudication as Williams v. B. and L. Association, bad we in fact overruled it. We do not think we have modified, much less overruled it. In that case tbe Court was…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Hill v. Board of SupervisorsNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  2. Rodman v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1902
  3. Taylor v. Cranberry Iron & Coal Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1886
  4. O'Shields v. Georgia Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1889
  5. Dishon v. Cincinnati, N. O. & T. P. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1904

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Trull v. Seaboard Air Line Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1909
  2. Tieffenbrun v. . FlannerySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  3. Tieffenbrun v. FlannerySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  4. Belch v. Seaboard Air Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1918
  5. Webb v. EgglestonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API