Legal Opinion

McNichols v. Richter

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided May 1, 1883PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Appeal from the St. Louis Circuit Court, HorNEr, J. A creditor, after notice of his debtor’s intent to hinder, delay, or defraud his other creditors, cannot make further advances to his debtor and take property therefor from this debtor; such a transfer of property is fraudulent as against other creditors. — Arnholt v. Hartwig, 73 Mo. 485. A creditor who knowingly takes property in value largely exceeding his debt cannot pretend to be judged by the rule relating to…

Read the full summary

Appeal from the St. Louis Circuit Court, HorNEr, J. A creditor, after notice of his debtor’s intent to hinder, delay, or defraud his other creditors, cannot make further advances to his debtor and take property therefor from this debtor; such a transfer of property is fraudulent as against other creditors. — Arnholt v. Hartwig, 73 Mo. 485. A creditor who knowingly takes property in value largely exceeding his debt cannot pretend to be judged by the rule relating to preferences of creditors, but stands as a purchaser, as against other creditors; and, therefore^ if while taking such property he…

1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.

The plaintiff is an attaching creditor of Fritz Richter. The contest is between him and George A. Rubleman & Co., who interpleaded in the attachment suit claiming the property attached. There was a jury trial and a verdict and judgment in favor of the interpleaders, from which the plaintiff has appealed.

The leading facts shown at the trial were that Fritz Richter, down to a period hereafter stated, carried on a *517considerable business in St. Louis as an upholsterer; that he employed a good many hands and did a business of the value of about $40,000 a year; that he carried a considerable stock…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Shelley v. BootheSupreme Court of Missouri · 1880
  2. Potter v. McDowellSupreme Court of Missouri · 1860
  3. Kuykendall ex rel. Middleton, Perry & Co. v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Missouri · 1852
  4. Arnholt v. HartwigSupreme Court of Missouri · 1881
  5. Allen v. BerrySupreme Court of Missouri · 1872

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Davis v. SchwartzSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  2. State ex rel. Robertson v. HopeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1890
  3. Conrad v. FisherMissouri Court of Appeals · 1889
  4. Bick v. SealMissouri Court of Appeals · 1891
  5. St. Louis Coffin Co. v. RubelmanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1884

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API