Legal Opinion

St. Louis Coffin Co. v. Rubelman

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 4, 1884PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from the St. Louis Circuit Court, Thayer, J. The court improperly amended the verdict. There was no judgmentas to one of the defendants.—2 Saund. (Eng.) 212, note 4; 2 Hill (N. Y.), 332 ; 48 Conn. 520 ; 45 Texas, 220-226 ; 2 Saund. 212 ; 5 Mass. 1; 1 Ld. Raym. 324, 600 ; 3 Mo. 39.0 ; 2 Mo. App. 571; affirmed, 7 Mo.

Read the full summary

Appeal from the St. Louis Circuit Court, Thayer, J. The court improperly amended the verdict. There was no judgmentas to one of the defendants.—2 Saund. (Eng.) 212, note 4; 2 Hill (N. Y.), 332 ; 48 Conn. 520 ; 45 Texas, 220-226 ; 2 Saund. 212 ; 5 Mass. 1; 1 Ld. Raym. 324, 600 ; 3 Mo. 39.0 ; 2 Mo. App. 571; affirmed, 7 Mo. App. 89 ; 17 Ga. 361; 12 111. 84 ; 37 111. 164 ; 2 Hill, 332 ; 4 Yeates (Penn.), 293 ; 2 Strange, 1089; .23 Mo. 389; 5 Mo. 51; 19 Mo. 442. It would be toó great a restriction upon the common business and traffic of men, if every purchase from a debtor were to be conclusively…

1Opinion of the CourtBakewell, J.

Plaintiff began suit ag-ainst Richter, on which it obtained judgment on February 14, 1882, for $1,001.09. Pending this action, plaintiff sued out an attachment in aid. The sheriff’s return to this writ shows that he executed it by declaring in writing to G. A. Rubelman & Co., by G. A. Rubleman, a member of said firm, that he attached in their hands all debts due from them to defendants, and all goods, moneys, effects, rights, credits, chattels, choses in action, and evidences of debt of the defendant Fritz Richter, or so much thereof as would be sufficient to satisfy the debt, interest, and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. McNichols v. RichterMissouri Court of Appeals · 1883
  2. State ex rel. Meyrose v. LaurieMissouri Court of Appeals · 1876

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Marx v. HartSupreme Court of Missouri · 1902
  2. Bick v. SealMissouri Court of Appeals · 1891
  3. National Commercial Bank v. McDonnellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
  4. State ex rel. Meysenburg v. Excelsior Distilling Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1885
  5. Adler v. AndersonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1890

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API