Legal Opinion
SINGH v. AVERETT
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided July 31, 2020No. 2:20-cv-01921Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA AMRITPAL SINGH : : CIVIL ACTION v. : : NO. 20-1921 DAVID J. AVERETT, ESQ. and : LAW OFFICES OF DAVID J. AVERETT, : P.C. : MEMORANDUM SURRICK, J. JULY 31, 2020 Presently before the Court is Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Amended Complaint. (ECF No. 8.) For the following reasons, Defendants’ Motion will be denied. I. BACKGROUND This is a legal malpractice action. Plaintiff Amritpal Singh ran a 7-Eleven franchise in Philadelphia. (Am. Compl. ¶¶ 8, ECF No. 6.) For years, Singh sought legal counsel from Defendants David…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Saint Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. v. Red Cab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Auto-Owners Insurance Company v. Stevens & Ricci IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2016
- Rizzo v. HainesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- James Suber v. Chrysler Corporation v. Kontinental Koaches, Inc., A/K/A and D/B/A Kontinental Konversions, Third-Party Chrysler Corporation, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
- Columbia Gas Transmission Corporation v. Michael D. TarbuckCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.