Legal Opinion

Horn v. District of Columbia

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided September 30, 2002No. Civ.A. 01-0225 GK/DARPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM ORDER

DEBORAH ANN ROBINSON, United States Magistrate Judge.

The Motion of the United States Motion [sic] for 90-Day Limited Stay of Discovery (Docket No. 113) is pending for determination by the undersigned.1 In the motion and memorandum in support thereof (hereinafter “motion”), the United States Attorney represents that his “investigation in the Horn matter” is ongoing, and that the “discovery contemplated by [the Court’s August 15, 2002 Order] ... is likely to cause interference with an ongoing investigation of interest to the United States.” Motion at l.2 The United States…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Landis v. North American Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  2. Alan McSurely v. John L. McClellan ChairmanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1970
  3. Favaloro v. S/S GOLDEN GATEDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1987
  4. United States v. Gieger Transfer Service, Inc.District Court, S.D. Mississippi · 1997
  5. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1991

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Doe v. SipperDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
  2. Hurst v. Enphase Energy, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API