Legal Opinion
City of Eugene v. STATE, PERB
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided June 30, 2006No. CC 99C-12794; CC 99C-12838; CC 99C-20235; CC 00C-16173; CA A121400; SC S50617PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDe Muniz, C. J.
Intervenors petition for reconsideration of this court’s decision in City of Eugene v. PERB, 339 Or 113, 117 P3d 1001 (2005), that dismissed their appeal as moot. Inter-venors are individual PERS members who intervened in the litigation below to defend, in part, employer contribution rate orders issued by the Public Employees Retirement Board (PERB) in 1998 and 2000. Because we concluded that their appeal had become moot, intervenors now ask this court, in keeping with First Commerce of America v. Nimbus Center Assoc., 329 Or 199, 986 P2d 556 (1999) (Nimbus), to vacate the judgment from which…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United States v. Munsingwear, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- U.S. Bancorp Mortgage Co. v. Bonner Mall PartnershipSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Kerr v. BradburyOregon Supreme Court · 2006
- First Commerce of America, Inc. v. Nimbus Center AssociatesOregon Supreme Court · 1999
- City of Eugene v. StateOregon Supreme Court · 2005
3Cited by7 opinions
- Arken v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 2011
- Department of Human Services v. B. A.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
- White v. Public Employees Retirement BoardOregon Supreme Court · 2011
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of GroomOregon Supreme Court · 2011
- Portland General Electric Co. v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local 125Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.