Legal Opinion

McRae v. Seafarers' Welfare Plan

District Court, S.D. Alabama

Decided December 4, 1989No. Civ. A. 88-00544-TPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

DANIEL HOLCOMBE THOMAS, Senior District Judge.

The above styled case was set for trial on October 4, 1989. This Court has fully con sidered all pertinent materials in the file and hereby makes the following Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law:

I.FINDINGS OF FACT.

1. At all material times, plaintiff, Vivion McRae, was an employee of Dravo Basic Materials, Co., where he and his dependents, specifically his wife, the Co-plaintiff, Paulette McRae, were insured beneficiaries of an employee benefit insurance plan known as Seafarers’ Welfare Plan (“the Plan”), an “employee welfare benefit…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Shellie P. McKnight v. Southern Life and Health Insurance Company, a Corporation, and Southern Life and Health Insurance Company Revised Retirement Plan, Shellie P. McKnight v. Southern Life and Health Insurance Company, a Corporation and Southern Life and Health Insurance Company Revised Retirement PlanCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
  3. Thomas v. Gulf Health Plan, Inc.District Court, S.D. Alabama · 1988

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Vivion McRae and Paulette McRae v. Seafarers' Welfare PlanCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1991
  2. Ritzer v. National Organization of Industrial Trade Unions Insurance Trust Fund Hospital, Medical, Surgical Health BenefitDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1992
  3. Long v. Houston Lighting & Power Co.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API