Legal Opinion

Richmond-Ashland Railway Co. v. Jackson

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided January 14, 1932PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.

Designating the parties as they stood in the trial court the defendant owns and operates an interurban electric line running between Ashland and Richmond, and of course through a part of that city. On November 7, 1929, plaintiff, a colored woman and passenger, boarded one of its cars to go to her home. • This was a one-man car, operated by the motorman who sat in what is described as a vestibule, the floor of which was a little below the floor of the car itself. As Lombardy street was reached it stopped to let out some children and as it started up plaintiff indicated her desire to get off at…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Kimball & Fink v. Friend's Adm' rSupreme Court of Virginia · 1897
  2. Riggsby v. TrittonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1925
  3. N. & W. R. R. v. FergusonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1884
  4. Richmond Traction Co. v. ClarkeSupreme Court of Virginia · 1903
  5. Hines v. BeardSupreme Court of Virginia · 1921

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hanley v. Milwaukee Electric Railway & Light Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Shamblee v. Virginia Transit Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1963
  3. Virginia Electric & Power Co. v. LowrySupreme Court of Virginia · 1936
  4. Richmond Greyhound Lines, Inc. v. RamosSupreme Court of Virginia · 1941
  5. Atlantic Greyhound Lines v. SkinnerSupreme Court of Virginia · 1939

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API