Legal Opinion

Balderas v. Tiny Lab Productions

District Court, D. New Mexico

Decided April 29, 2020No. 1:18-cv-00854Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO STATE OF NEW MEXICO EX REL. HECTOR BALDERAS, ATTORNEY GENERAL, Plaintiff, v. No. 18-854 MV/JFR TINY LAB PRODUCTIONS; TWITTER INC.; MOPUB, INC.; GOOGLE, INC.; ADMOB, INC.; AERSERV LLC; INMOBI PTE LTD.; APPLOVIN CORPORATION; and IRONSOURCE USA, INC. Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the SDK Defendants’1 Motion to Dismiss the Complaint for Failure to State a Claim (“SDK Defendants’ Motion”) [Doc. 47] and Defendant Google’s2 Motion to Dismiss (“Google’s Motion”) [Doc. 50]. The Court, having considered…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Smith v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
  5. Fidelity Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. De La CuestaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API