Turgeau v. Administrative Review Board
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
McKAY, Circuit Judge.
This equitable tolling case revolves around one crucial legal point — that a completely preempted state law claim becomes the federal claim that Congress enacted to replace the state remedy. Respondent Department of Labor and Intervenor The NORDAM Group, Inc. have not appreciated this key point. They therefore incorrectly argue, and the Department of Labor’s Administrative Review Board (ARB) incorrectly held, that petitioner Brian Tur-geau was not entitled to equitable tolling of his untimely filed federal administrative claim because his timely — and completely preempted…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Irwin v. Department of Veterans AffairsSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Johnson v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- United States v. MitchellCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
- Devon Energy Production Co. v. Mosiac Potash Carlsbad, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
- Firstenberg v. City of Santa FeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
- Salzer v. SSM Health Care of Oklahoma Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014
- Apostolos Xanthopoulos v. LABRCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2021
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.