Legal Opinion
State v. Lambert
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided July 31, 1986No. C9-85-2381PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NIERENGARTEN, Judge.
Jean Lambert appeals from an order denying her motion for resentencing pursuant to Minn.R.Crim.P. 28. She argues her sentence is not authorized by law because she was sentenced according to minimum guidelines promulgated by a group of district court judges. We reverse and remand.
FACTS
In May 1985 appellant Jean Lambert was charged with driving while intoxicated and with a blood alcohol concentration over .10 percent in violation of state law. See Minn. Stat. § 169.121, subd. 1(a), (d) (1984). Pursuant to a plea agreement, she withdrew her not guilty plea and pleaded…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Woodson v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States Parole Commission v. GeraghtySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- United States v. Jackie David MillerCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1978
- Robert Michael Woosley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1973
- State v. OlsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. LambertSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
- State v. KoperskiCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000
- State v. BymanCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
- State v. RogersCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986