Legal Opinion
Matthew Beeman v. United Parks & Resorts, Inc.
District Court, M.D. Florida
Decided August 14, 2026No. 6:25-cv-01931Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION MATTHEW BEEMAN, Plaintiff, v. Case No: 6:25-cv-1931-JSS-DCI UNITED PARKS & RESORTS, INC., Defendant. ___________________________________/ ORDER Defendant, United Parks & Resorts, Inc., D/B/A SeaWorld Parks & Entertainment, Inc., moves to dismiss the complaint. (Dkts. 22, 26.) Plaintiff, Matthew Beeman, opposes the motion. (Dkt. 23.) Upon consideration, for the reasons outlined below, the court denies the motion. BACKGROUND1 Defendant is “a global theme park and entertainment company that owns or licenses a diverse…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Edwin P. Harrison, and United States of America, Party in Interest v. Westinghouse Savannah River CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1999
- Marx v. General Revenue Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Brooks v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Florida, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.