State v. Hayes
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Per curiam
In this case, the Court of Appeals concluded
that if: (1) there has been a full evidentiary hearing where the substance of the objection(s) raised by the motion in limine has been thoroughly explored; (2) the order denying the motion is explicit and definitive; (3) the evidence actually offered at trial is substantially consistent with the evidence explored at the hearing on the motion; and (4) there is no suggestion that the trial court would reconsider the matter at trial, an objection to the denial of the motion in limine is alone sufficient to preserve the evidentiary issues.which were the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. ConawaySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1995
- State v. BonnettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1998
- T&T Development Co. v. Southern National Bank of South CarolinaCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1997
- Martin v. BensonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1998
- State v. MebaneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- State v. GolphinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2000
- State v. BardenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2002
- State v. GroomsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2000
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2000
- State v. McNeilSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1999
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.