Legal Opinion

Attorney-General ex rel. Bliss v. Linden Cemetery Ass'n

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided May 26, 1919PublishedCited by 12 opinions

On motion, &c.

1Opinion of the Court

Backes, V. C.

These cemeteries — Linden and Rosedale — have been administered by the receiver as a single trust. The receiver moves that his intermediate report he approved and that allowance be made to him for his operating expenses and services and for counsel fees to his counsel. There is no opposition, and his report is approved and the allowances asked for are granted. The receiver, has not enough money to pay them and he will be permitted to borrow on bis certificates to supply the deficiency. •

The receiver has a balance on hand of, approximate!}’, $2,500, and the controversy is over the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wallace v. LoomisSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Evergreen Cemetery Ass'n v. BeecherSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1886
  3. Wolford v. Crystal Lake Cemetery Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
  4. Reeder v. GorsuchSupreme Court of Kansas · 1895

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Miller Ex Rel. Continental Mortgage Investors v. Leadership Housing Systems, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Lawlor v. Cloverleaf Memorial Park, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1969
  3. Sullivan v. James Leo Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1938
  4. Spark v. La Reine Hotel Corp.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1933
  5. Bowes v. United StatesNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1940

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API