Sullivan v. James Leo Co.
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
Two questions require decision in this cause.
1. Are the fees of the receivers, of their counsel and costs of administration entitled to priority to the proceeds resulting from the sale, by the receivers, of certain of the property and assets of the insolvent defendant corporation, or are the taxes due to the city of Jersey City thereon entitled to priority when, as here, those taxes were assessed and became due during the administration of the insolvent corporation by the receivers but subsequent to the time when the court of chancery had already impressed the property to be sold with a prior…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Isaacs v. Hobbs Tie & Timber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Van Huffel v. HarkelrodeSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Grobholz v. Merdel Mortgage Investment Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1934
- Seidler v. Branford Restaurant, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1925
- Attorney-General ex rel. Bliss v. Linden Cemetery Ass'nNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1919
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- M. Rutkin Elect. Sup. Co. v. Burdette Elect.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1967
- Matter of Valley Road Sewerage Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1996
- Bigel v. Brandtjen Kluge, Inc.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1941
- Campbell v. HellerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955
- Pemberton, Etc., Industries v. Wm. G. Ridgway Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.