Townsend v. Sullivan
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Siskiyou County, and from an order denying a new trial. J. S. Beard, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMcLAUGHLIN, J.
In the complaint in this action it was in substance alleged: That on February 27, 1900, the defend ant obtained from N. H. Eddy the sum of $1,500 as a loan for his exclusive use and benefit. That to evidence and secure said indebtedness and its repayment, said defendant procured plaintiff’s intestate to join him in the making of a promissory note signed by defendant and James and Nancy Carpenter. That to further secure said indebtedness, said intestate, at the special instance and request of said defendant, and for his exclusive use and benefit, executed and delivered to Eddy a mortgage on…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Knight v. TrippCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Pullen v. Placer Country BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- Hart v. KetchumCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Adams v. WallaceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Callahan v. BroderickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Connell v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1953
- Connell v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1953