People v. Loris
Colorado Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by JUDGE ROMÁN
¶ 1 Defendant, Colleen Marie Loris, appeals her thirty-two-year sentence under the habitual criminal statute. We first conclude that her thirty-two-year sentence for possession with intent to distribute does not raise an inference of gross disproportionality.
¶ 2 We further conclude that the district court was required to apply the habitual criminal sentence multiplier to defendant's level 2 drug felony. Analyzing the sentencing scheme as a whole, the legislature has evinced an unmistakable intent to multiply the maximum of the presumptive range for certain drug felonies…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Solem v. HelmSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Harmelin v. MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Close v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2002
- People v. GaskinsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1992
- People v. MershonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1994
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Yates v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2019
- Peo v. AlexanderColorado Court of Appeals · 2022
- Peo v. PrideColorado Court of Appeals · 2024