Legal Opinion

People v. Loris

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided July 26, 2018No. Court of Appeals No. 15CA0127PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by JUDGE ROMÁN

¶ 1 Defendant, Colleen Marie Loris, appeals her thirty-two-year sentence under the habitual criminal statute. We first conclude that her thirty-two-year sentence for possession with intent to distribute does not raise an inference of gross disproportionality.

¶ 2 We further conclude that the district court was required to apply the habitual criminal sentence multiplier to defendant's level 2 drug felony. Analyzing the sentencing scheme as a whole, the legislature has evinced an unmistakable intent to multiply the maximum of the presumptive range for certain drug felonies…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Solem v. HelmSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Harmelin v. MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Close v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2002
  4. People v. GaskinsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1992
  5. People v. MershonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1994

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Yates v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2019
  2. Peo v. AlexanderColorado Court of Appeals · 2022
  3. Peo v. PrideColorado Court of Appeals · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API