Legal Opinion

People v. Gaskins

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided January 13, 1992No. 90SC437PublishedCited by 60 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Lohr

We granted the People’s petition for cer-tiorari to determine whether the Colorado Court of Appeals correctly concluded that the defendant, John Harvey Gaskins, was entitled to a proportionality review of a life sentence imposed pursuant to the habitual criminal statute, section 16-13-101, 8A C.R.S. (1986), and, if so, whether the court abused its discretion in remanding the case to the trial court to conduct the review. We hold that a proportionality review of a life sentence imposed under the Colorado habitual criminal statute is required by the cruel and unusual punishments clauses of the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Solem v. HelmSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Harmelin v. MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Robinson v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. Rummel v. EstelleSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Coker v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by60 opinions

  1. People v. StrockColorado Court of Appeals · 2010
  2. People v. MershonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1994
  3. People v. DerouletSupreme Court of Colorado · 2002
  4. Yates v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2019
  5. People v. StreanColorado Court of Appeals · 2002

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API