People v. Gaskins
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Lohr
We granted the People’s petition for cer-tiorari to determine whether the Colorado Court of Appeals correctly concluded that the defendant, John Harvey Gaskins, was entitled to a proportionality review of a life sentence imposed pursuant to the habitual criminal statute, section 16-13-101, 8A C.R.S. (1986), and, if so, whether the court abused its discretion in remanding the case to the trial court to conduct the review. We hold that a proportionality review of a life sentence imposed under the Colorado habitual criminal statute is required by the cruel and unusual punishments clauses of the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Solem v. HelmSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Harmelin v. MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Robinson v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Rummel v. EstelleSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Coker v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by60 opinions
- People v. StrockColorado Court of Appeals · 2010
- People v. MershonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1994
- People v. DerouletSupreme Court of Colorado · 2002
- Yates v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2019
- People v. StreanColorado Court of Appeals · 2002
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.