Legal Opinion

Liquid Veneer Corporation v. Smuckler

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 10, 1937No. 8138Published

1Opinion of the Court

90 F.2d 196 (1937)

LIQUID VENEER CORPORATION

v.

SMUCKLER.[*]

No. 8138.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

May 10, 1937.

Paul V. Sheehan, of Buffalo, N. Y., and Bicksler, Parke & Catlin, of Los Angeles, Cal., for appellant.

Harry Graham Balter, of Los Angeles, Cal., for appellee.

Before WILBUR and MATHEWS, Circuit Judges, and NETERER, District Judge.

NETERER, District Judge.

The appellee, on December 17, 1931, filed a complaint for libel in the Superior Court of the State of California, Los Angeles County, against the appellant, a New York corporation, in which she alleges that she manufactured and…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Davis v. HearstCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Scott v. Times-Mirror Co.California Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Tingley v. Times Mirror Co.California Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Clark v. McClurgCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Myers v. Pittsburgh Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1914

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API