Legal Opinion
Locklin v. Switzer Bros.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 30, 1965No. 19467PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MERRILL, Circuit Judge:
This appeal is taken from an order adjudging appellants guilty of civil contempt for violation of an injunction against infringement of appellee’s patent. The injunction was issued pursuant to mandate of this court following our decision holding appellee’s patent valid and infringed, Locklin v. Switzer Bros., Inc., 299 F.2d 160 (9 Cir. 1961), cert. denied, 369 U.S. 861, 82 S.Ct. 950, 8 L.Ed.2d 18 (1962).
The patent there in issue, the Kazenas patent,1 was for a resin which was a co-condensation of a melamine, a sulfona-mide and an aldehyde, and which possessed…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Locklin v. Switzer Bros.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1961
3Cited by5 opinions
- Locklin v. Switzer BrothersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1965
- Locklin v. Day-Glo Color Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972
- Harry J. Locklin and Elmer J. Brant, General Partners Doing Business Under the Firm Name of Radiant Color Company v. Switzer Brothers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966
- Harry P. Locklin and Elmer J. Brant, General Partners, Dba Radiant Color Company v. Day-Glo Color Corp., Harry P. Locklin and Elmer J. Brant, General Partners, Dba Radiant Color Company v. Day-Glo Color Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972
- Locklin v. Switzer Bros.District Court, N.D. California · 1966