Legal Opinion

R/L Associates, Inc. v. Klockars

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided November 14, 1988No. 20300-2-IPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSwanson, J.

Quaere: When does a lot boundary adjustment create an additional "lot" or "site" for purposes of the Seattle Municipal Code? R/L Associates, Inc. (R/L), a Washington corporation, appeals from a superior court judgment affirming an adverse resolution of this question.

R/L owns two adjacent platted lots (lots 1 and 2) located at 9058 Burke Avenue North in Seattle. The lots, which together comprise 7,800 square feet, are in a single-family zone; current regulations establish a minimum building lot size of 5,000 square feet (SF 5000). The platted lot line separating lots 1 and 2 runs east-west. A…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Nollan v. California Coastal CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. First English Evangelical Lutheran Church v. County of Los AngelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Agins v. City of TiburonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Keystone Bituminous Coal Assn. v. DeBenedictisSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Chelan County v. NykreimWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Chelan County v. NykreimWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Freeburg v. City of SeattleCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1993
  4. Cox v. City of LynnwoodCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1993
  5. Chelan County v. NykreimCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API