Legal Opinion

Smith v. Dunn

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 29, 1940PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBelt, J.

This appeal involves three alleged causes of action; viz, (1) Money had and received; (2) conversion ; (3) reasonable value of services rendered.

Plaintiff, in Ms complaint, alleges:

(First Cause)

“I.
“That between the 1st day of June, 1938, and the 1st day of August, 1939, the defendant had and received from the plaintiff the sum of $1090.97, to the use and benefit of the plaintiff herein.
“II.
“That thereafter and before the commencement of this action, namely: on the 28th day of July, 1939, plaintiff demanded the sum so received, from the defendant herein but that the defendant wholly refused…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Vanderpool v. BurkittOregon Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Hunt v. First National BankOregon Supreme Court · 1921

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Cross v. CampbellOregon Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Genest v. John Glenn CorporationOregon Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Burlington Northern Inc. v. LesterCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
  4. Booher v. BrownOregon Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Morgan v. BrinkhoffSupreme Court of Colorado · 1960

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API