Legal Opinion

Shepard v. City of Seattle

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 16, 1910No. 8849PublishedCited by 28 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, W. T. Dovell, Esq., judge pro tempore, entered March 14, 1910, upon findings in favor of the defendant, after a-trial on the merits before the court without a jury, dismissing an action to restrain the enforcement of an ordinance.

1Opinion of the Court

Rudkin C. J.

This action was instituted by the plaintiffs, as owners and lessees of certain property in the city of Seattle, to restrain the city from enforcing, as against the plaintiffs and their property, the provisions of an ordinance entitled, “An ordinance regulating the location and maintenance of private hospitals and sanitariums, and providing for penalties for the violation of the provisions hereof, and declaring an emergency.”

Section one of the ordinance reads as follows:

“No private hospital or sanitarium shall be established or maintained within the city of Seattle in any building…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Matter of Application of JacobsNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
  2. People v. . HavnorNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
  3. Ex parte WhitwellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Wilson v. Eureka CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  5. Ex parte BizzellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1895

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. American Legion Post 149 v. WASH. DEPT. OF HEALTHWashington Supreme Court · 2008
  2. American Legion Post No. 149 v. Department of HealthWashington Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Opinion of the Justices to the House of RepresentativesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1920
  4. State v. Mountain Timber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Mission Springs Inc. v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1998

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API