Legal Opinion

Slattery v. State

Texas Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1874PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal from Galveston. Tried below before the Hon. Samuel Dodge.*

1Opinion of the Court

Roberts, Chief Justice.

This is an indictment for *620{£ maiming,” in which it is charged that the defendant bit off the under lip of Charles Clark, the indictment being very accurately drawn up in proper form under the following provision of the code, to wit, (Pas. Dig., art. 2162, (500 :) “To maim is to cut off or otherwise deprive a person of the hand, arm, finger, foot, leg, nose, or ear, to put out an eye, or in any way to deprive the person of any other member of his body.”

It was shown in evidence that the piece of flesh bit out by defendant from Clark’s under lip was about an inch long and…

2Cited by12 opinions

  1. United States v. Earl CookCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
  2. People v. KeenanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
  3. Goodman v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
  4. Schmick v. NoelTexas Supreme Court · 1888
  5. People v. HillCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API