Legal Opinion
Marketing and Research Counselors, Inc. v. Booth
District Court, N.D. Georgia
Decided January 17, 1985No. C84-1353APublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER OF COURT
MOYE, Chief Judge.
The above-styled action is before the Court on the defendants’ motion for partial summary judgment. After a review of the pleadings and the relevant case law, this Court concludes that the defendants’ motion must be granted in part and denied in part.
FACTS
The defendant, Peter E. Booth, was employed by the plaintiff, Marketing and Research Counselors, Inc., for approximately 10 years. During his employment, the defendant signed a nonsolicitation agreement with the plaintiff. This agreement contained the following two provisions in paragraphs two and five:
For a…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Durham v. Stand-By Labor of Georgia, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1973
- Nasco, Inc. v. GimbertSupreme Court of Georgia · 1977
- Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. Reese M. Stidham, Iii, H. Paige Scarborough and John A. BrunerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- Nordson Corporation v. Joseph Plasschaert and Ranier CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1982
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- James A. Keener v. Convergys Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2002
- John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance v. AustinDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1996
- Monsanto Company v. Warren J. ManningCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
- Salsbury Laboratories, Inc. v. Merieux Laboratories, Inc.District Court, M.D. Georgia · 1988
- Keener v. Convergys Corp.District Court, S.D. Georgia · 2002
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.