Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Johnson v. International Harvester Co.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 5, 1976No. 400622E, CA 4742PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*11SCHWAB, C. J.

In this suit in equity brought under the Unfair and Unlawful Trade Practices Act, ORS ch 646, the state’s complaint charged the defendant with misrepresenting the capacity of a truck, sold to one Valeu, in violation of ORS 646.608(1)(e) and (g).1 The state sought (1) a civil penalty, (2) attorney fees, (3) an order that the defendant modify the truck so that it complied with defendant’s representations to Valeu, and (4) an injunction restraining defendant

" ** * * from representing that goods have characteristics or qualities that they do not have, and from representing that goods…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hecht Co. v. BowlesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Rondeau v. Mosinee Paper Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State Land Board v. HeukerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976
  2. State Ex Rel. Cox v. Davidson Industries, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1981
  3. State ex rel. Danforth v. W. E. Construction Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1977
  4. City of Portland v. SettergrenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976
  5. State ex rel. Cox v. Davidson Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1980

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API