Legal Opinion

City of Portland v. Settergren

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 1, 1976No. 402-247, CA 4937PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFoley, P. J.

In the process of constructing a large, concrete reservoir for the City of Portland in 1973, defendant Settergren, the contractor, placed approximately 5,000 yards of earth material on hillside property belonging to defendants Tegart, located on Fairmount Boulevard. The contractor had permits for the removal of the material from the reservoir site but did not obtain the required permits for placing the fill material on the Tegarts’ land. Pursuant to initial proceedings by the city against him only, defendant Settergren removed and hauled away a portion of the fill material.

In September 1974…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Hecht Co. v. BowlesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Rondeau v. Mosinee Paper Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Jackson v. StevensonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1892
  4. Amerman v. . DeaneNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  5. Frankland v. City of Lake OswegoOregon Supreme Court · 1973

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Cox v. Davidson Industries, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1981
  2. State ex rel. Cox v. Davidson Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API