Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Cox v. Davidson Industries, Inc.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided November 3, 1981No. 77-5311, CA 15484, SC 27541PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDenecke, C. J.

The defendant timber company placed a fill, to be used as a road, on property near the mouth of the Siuslaw River. The plaintiff Cox, Director of the Division of State Lands, brought this suit seeking a mandatory injunction requiring the defendant to remove the fill because the defendant built it without securing a permit from the Division. ORS 541.615 provides that no person “shall * * * fill any waters of this state without a permit issued under authority of the Director of the Division of State Lands * * The trial court held the plaintiff had not proved the fill was constructed upon the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hecht Co. v. BowlesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Frankland v. City of Lake OswegoOregon Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Dilger v. School District 24CJOregon Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Texas Pet Foods, Inc. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1975
  5. Morgan v. Stimson Lumber Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1980

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Oregon School Activities Ass'n v. StoutCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
  2. Roach v. Jackson CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
  3. Western Communications, Inc. v. Deschutes CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
  4. Karson v. Oregon Liquor Control CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
  5. Western Communications, Inc. v. Deschutes CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API