Legal Opinion

White v. Kane

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided February 6, 1923PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEschweiler, J.

The defendant Liability Company contends that the questions raised by its demurrer are not, as it was held in the court below, disposed of against it by the ruling of this court in Ehlers v. Automobile Liability Co. (this same defendant), 166 Wis. 185, 164 N. W. 845. It urges that the policy sued, upon here is unlike the one in that case, inasmuch as in this one, by the clause quoted first in the foregoing statement, it only undertakes that “it will pay to assured the amount of any filial judgment for damages . . . rendered against the assured after trial of the issue,” etc.; while by the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Hennessey v. TaylorMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905
  2. Lorando v. GethroMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
  3. Knapp v. . BarrettNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
  4. Creedon v. GalvinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
  5. Harker v. GruhlIndiana Court of Appeals · 1916

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Jacobsen v. HowardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  2. McGill v. BaumgartWisconsin Supreme Court · 1939
  3. O'Neal v. Transportation Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1925
  4. O'Neal v. Pocahontas Transportation Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Polzin v. WachtlWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API