Legal Opinion

O'Neal v. Pocahontas Transportation Co.

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided September 8, 1925No. C. C. 353PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Lively, President:

Having overruled demurrers to the declaration, the trial judge on his own motion certified his ruling for review.

The declaration consists of two counts, the first of which contains the common counts in assumpsit; and the second count charges, in substance, that defendant Pocahontas Transportation Company applied to the State Eoad Commission for a certificate of convenience to operate automobiles for carriage of passengers and freight for hire between stated termini, and was given such certificate of convenience and filed as required by law with the Commission liability…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Devoto v. United Auto Transportation Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Milliron v. DittmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Smith Stage Co. v. EckertArizona Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Knotts v. McGregorWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Shafer v. Security Trust Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1918

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Aetna Life Ins. Co. of Hartford, Conn. v. MaxwellCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1937
  2. Graves v. HarringtonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  3. Great American Indemnity Co. v. VickersCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936
  4. Conwell v. HaysWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Shepherd v. Pocahontas Transportation Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1926

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API